The Roberts Court's Review of Administrative Action:: Promoting Political Accountability or Intensifying Process Review?

Harold J. Krent

The Roberts Court's Review of Administrative Action: Promoting Political Accountability or Intensifying Process Review?

Harold J. Krent

Chicago-Kent College of Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

Abstract

response to Benjamin Eidelson, Reasoned Explanation and Political Accountability in the Roberts Court, 130 YALE L.J. 1748, 1748, 1752–60 (2021)

Original language	American English
Pages (from-to)	123-133
Journal	Administrative Law Review Accord
Volume	7
Issue number	1
State	Published - 2022

Disciplines

Supreme Court of the United States
Administrative Law

Access to Document

https://administrativelawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/04/Krent_Final.pdfLicense: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{1e8f84b0e716494dbf42afa5712662a5,

title = "The Roberts Court's Review of Administrative Action:: Promoting Political Accountability or Intensifying Process Review?",

abstract = "response to Benjamin Eidelson, Reasoned Explanation and Political Accountability in the Roberts Court, 130 YALE L.J. 1748, 1748, 1752–60 (2021) ",

author = "Krent, \{Harold J.\}",

year = "2022",

language = "American English",

volume = "7",

pages = "123--133",

journal = "Administrative Law Review Accord",

publisher = "American University Washington College of Law",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Roberts Court's Review of Administrative Action:

T2 - Promoting Political Accountability or Intensifying Process Review?

AU - Krent, Harold J.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - response to Benjamin Eidelson, Reasoned Explanation and Political Accountability in the Roberts Court, 130 YALE L.J. 1748, 1748, 1752–60 (2021)

AB - response to Benjamin Eidelson, Reasoned Explanation and Political Accountability in the Roberts Court, 130 YALE L.J. 1748, 1748, 1752–60 (2021)

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 7

SP - 123

EP - 133

JO - Administrative Law Review Accord

JF - Administrative Law Review Accord

IS - 1

ER -