Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Skin in the Game: Human Tissue as Property

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In 2023, Henrietta Lacks’ family won a settlement from Thermo Fisher Scientific on the grounds that the company had been “unjustly enriched” by the sale of products developed with Henrietta’s cells. Given that hundreds of thousands of people have tissue stored in the United States, this article explores how today’s patients might fare if they similarly sued professionals and companies that undertake unauthorized research on or commercialization of their tissue on the grounds of conversion, unjust enrichment, lack of informed consent, breach of fiduciary duty and, where government entities are involved, Fourteenth Amendment claims. The article notes that the practices that were subsequently seen as unethical in Henrietta Lacks’ care continue in some health care institutions today. It also analyzes how research and commercialization without consent can lead to a lack of trust in the research enterprise and the unwillingness of people to participate in research.
Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)191 - 203
Number of pages13
JournalAmerican Journal of Law and Medicine
Volume50
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 24 2025

Keywords

  • unjust enrichment
  • biotechnology
  • informed consent
  • property rights in the body
  • human tissue
  • tissue banks
  • research ethics
  • Henrietta Lacks

Disciplines

  • Health Law and Policy
  • Bioethics and Medical Ethics
  • Laboratory and Basic Science Research

Cite this