Revisiting the Meltzer-Howlett Debate on External Law in Labor Arbitration: Is It Time for Courts to Declare Howlett the Winner?

Martin H Malin

Revisiting the Meltzer-Howlett Debate on External Law in Labor Arbitration: Is It Time for Courts to Declare Howlett the Winner?

Martin H Malin

Chicago-Kent College of Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	American English
Journal	The Labor Lawyer
Volume	24
State	Published - 2008

Disciplines

Law

Access to Document

fulltext.pdfFinal published version, 1.66 MBLicense: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{327bdb93067e4f20a433083d0f195754,

title = "Revisiting the Meltzer-Howlett Debate on External Law in Labor Arbitration: Is It Time for Courts to Declare Howlett the Winner?",

author = "Malin, \{Martin H\}",

note = "Revisiting the Meltzer-Howlett Debate on External Law in Labor Arbitration: Is It Time for Courts to Declare Howlett the Winner?, 24 The Labor Lawyer 1 (2008).",

year = "2008",

language = "American English",

volume = "24",

journal = "The Labor Lawyer",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting the Meltzer-Howlett Debate on External Law in Labor Arbitration

T2 - Is It Time for Courts to Declare Howlett the Winner?

AU - Malin, Martin H

N1 - Revisiting the Meltzer-Howlett Debate on External Law in Labor Arbitration: Is It Time for Courts to Declare Howlett the Winner?, 24 The Labor Lawyer 1 (2008).

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

M3 - Article

VL - 24

JO - The Labor Lawyer

JF - The Labor Lawyer

ER -