Retrying the Acquitted in England, Part I: The Exception to the Rule Against Double Jeopardy for "New and Compelling Evidence"

David S Rudstein

Retrying the Acquitted in England, Part I: The Exception to the Rule Against Double Jeopardy for "New and Compelling Evidence"

David S Rudstein

Chicago-Kent College of Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	American English
Journal	San Diego International Law Journal
Volume	8
State	Published - Jun 2007

Disciplines

Law

Access to Document

fulltext.pdfFinal published version, 5.13 MBLicense: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{5102ec69de73482982ec366c7c5f3499,

title = "Retrying the Acquitted in England, Part I: The Exception to the Rule Against Double Jeopardy for {"}New and Compelling Evidence{"}",

author = "Rudstein, \{David S\}",

note = "Retrying the Acquitted in England, Part I: The Exception to the Rule Against Double Jeopardy for {"}New and Compelling Evidence,{"} 8 San Diego International Law Journal 387 (2007).",

year = "2007",

month = jun,

language = "American English",

volume = "8",

journal = "San Diego International Law Journal",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Retrying the Acquitted in England, Part I

T2 - The Exception to the Rule Against Double Jeopardy for "New and Compelling Evidence"

AU - Rudstein, David S

N1 - Retrying the Acquitted in England, Part I: The Exception to the Rule Against Double Jeopardy for "New and Compelling Evidence," 8 San Diego International Law Journal 387 (2007).

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - San Diego International Law Journal

JF - San Diego International Law Journal

ER -