Numbers, Motivated Reasoning, and Empirical Legal Scholarship

Carolyn Shapiro

Numbers, Motivated Reasoning, and Empirical Legal Scholarship

Carolyn Shapiro

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

Abstract

Reponse to papers by Lee Epstein, Christopher M. Parker & Jeffrey A. Segal, Do Justices Defend the Speech They Hate? In Group Bias, Opportunism, and the First
Amendment and Todd E. Pettys, Free Expression, In Group Bias, and The
Court's Conservatives: A Critique of the Epstein Parker Segal Study

Original language	American English
Pages (from-to)	385-390
Journal	Buffalo Law Review
Volume	63
Issue number	2
State	Published - Jan 19 2015

Keywords

statistics and probability

Disciplines

Jurisprudence
Supreme Court of the United States
Political Science
Legal Studies

Access to Document

Numbers Motivated Reasoning and Empirical Legal Scholarship.pdfFinal published version, 322 KBLicense: Unspecified

https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/buffalolawreview/vol63/iss2/6/License: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{300be91840da4787aa2edaf579fbf711,

title = "Numbers, Motivated Reasoning, and Empirical Legal Scholarship",

abstract = "Reponse to papers by Lee Epstein, Christopher M. Parker \& Jeffrey A. Segal, Do Justices Defend the Speech They Hate? In Group Bias, Opportunism, and the First Amendment and Todd E. Pettys, Free Expression, In Group Bias, and The Court's Conservatives: A Critique of the Epstein Parker Segal Study",

keywords = "statistics and probability",

author = "Carolyn Shapiro",

note = "Carolyn Shapiro, Numbers, Motivated Reasoning, and Empirical Legal Scholarship, 63 Buff. L. Rev. 385 (2015). https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/buffalolawreview/vol63/iss2/6",

year = "2015",

month = jan,

day = "19",

language = "American English",

volume = "63",

pages = "385--390",

journal = "Buffalo Law Review",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Numbers, Motivated Reasoning, and Empirical Legal Scholarship

AU - Shapiro, Carolyn

N1 - Carolyn Shapiro, Numbers, Motivated Reasoning, and Empirical Legal Scholarship, 63 Buff. L. Rev. 385 (2015). https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/buffalolawreview/vol63/iss2/6

PY - 2015/1/19

Y1 - 2015/1/19

N2 - Reponse to papers by Lee Epstein, Christopher M. Parker & Jeffrey A. Segal, Do Justices Defend the Speech They Hate? In Group Bias, Opportunism, and the First Amendment and Todd E. Pettys, Free Expression, In Group Bias, and The Court's Conservatives: A Critique of the Epstein Parker Segal Study

AB - Reponse to papers by Lee Epstein, Christopher M. Parker & Jeffrey A. Segal, Do Justices Defend the Speech They Hate? In Group Bias, Opportunism, and the First Amendment and Todd E. Pettys, Free Expression, In Group Bias, and The Court's Conservatives: A Critique of the Epstein Parker Segal Study

KW - statistics and probability

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 63

SP - 385

EP - 390

JO - Buffalo Law Review

JF - Buffalo Law Review

IS - 2

ER -